THE $625,000 GRIFT: Karmelo Anthony Claims He’s “Destitute” While Parents Move Into a $900k Mansion

The saga of Karmelo Anthony, the 19-year-old convicted of the first-degree m*rder of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf, has just taken its most sickening turn yet.

While the Metcalf family continues to endure death threats, swatting incidents, and the unbearable pain of visiting their son’s grave, the Anthony family has reportedly been busy with a very different task: managing their new fortune.

Reports now confirm that while Karmelo’s defense fund raised over $625,000, his parents have used that money to secure a $900,000 mansion and a $150,000 luxury vehicle. Yet, in a move that has left legal analysts and taxpayers absolutely enraged, Karmelo Anthony has filed official paperwork with the court claiming he is “penniless, destitute, and indigent,” demanding that the taxpayers provide him with a free public defender for his appeal.

The “Penniless” Ploy

In the legal filings obtained by reporters, Anthony asserts that he has no financial resources to hire counsel. This claim is being met with disbelief by the Frisco community. How can a convicted murderer be “indigent” when his family is currently relocating into a luxury property purchased with the very funds meant to defend him in court?

The filing is being viewed as a desperate, arrogant attempt to manipulate the justice system. By claiming poverty, Anthony is effectively asking the state of Texas to foot the bill for his legal battle—a legal battle he needs specifically because his high-priced team failed to win the first time.

The Missing $625,000

The controversy surrounding the GiveSendGo crowdfunding campaign continues to grow. Donors who contributed to the $625,000 fund believed they were helping a “young boy” pay for legal experts. Instead, it appears the money was treated as a family windfall.

Reporters have confirmed a chilling detail: when the guilty verdict was read on Tuesday, Karmelo’s parents were not even in the courtroom.

While their son was being sentenced to 35 years, they were reportedly absent—a detail that has added fuel to the fire. Sources suggest they were busy finalizing the logistics of their new, opulent lifestyle. To make matters worse, there are now credible reports that the family is planning to launch a new, $1 million fundraising campaign, banking on the idea that they can continue to exploit the tragedy for personal gain.

The “Watermelon Felon” and the Boiling Point

The strain of this ongoing deception has pushed the victim’s family to the brink. Jeff Metcalf, Austin’s father, recently broke his silence with a scathing, controversial remark, reportedly referring to Anthony as a “watermelon felon.”

The slur, which carries heavy historical and racial weight, signals that the Metcalf family has reached the end of their patience. They are no longer interested in “taking the high road” while their son’s killer lives on donor-funded luxury and plots his next legal stunt. The Metcalf family has been forced to endure swatting, harassment, and threats, all while watching the Anthony family monetize their son’s death.

The Demand for Accountability

The Frisco community and legal experts are now calling for a full, forensic audit of the Anthony family’s finances. If funds raised for “legal defense” were diverted into the purchase of a $900,000 home and a $150,000 car, this could constitute wire fraud—a federal crime.

Karmelo Anthony’s quest for a “free” lawyer is not just an insult to the court; it is an insult to every taxpayer and every donor who was misled into thinking their money was for justice.

As the judge prepares to rule on the “indigent” request, one thing is clear: the house of cards built on lies, crowdfunding, and luxury cars is beginning to collapse. Austin Metcalf’s memory deserves truth, and the public is finally demanding it.

👇 Click the link below the comments to see the public records of the property purchase and read the full breakdown of the $625k crowdfunding fraud!

Karmelo Anthony Judge Calls Him ‘Nice Young Man’ But Stands By Jury’s 35-Year Sentence

The judge who presided over a teenage murder trial in Texas that sparked a racial debate in the suburbs of Dallas has defended the controversial 35-year sentence of a 19-year-old Black man he called a “nice young man” and said he’s able to sleep “well at night” following the trial.

Supporters of Austin Metcalf and Karmelo Anthony clash outside of the Collin County Courthouse on Tuesday, June 9, 2026.
The Dallas Morning News via Getty Images

Key Facts

Judge John Roach Jr., who has been the subject of criticism amid a larger examination of the Karmelo Anthony case, told a local TV station he thinks the jury reached the correct verdict and that he thinks Collin County’s handling of the trial should serve as a model for other jurisdictions dealing with similar situations.

Roach, who was criticized for refusing to allow news cameras in the courtroom, shot down rumors he was personally connected to the victim’s family and said Anthony “seems like a nice young man who committed a crime and he understands today more than any day before the consequences of committing a crime like he did.”

Anthony was found guilty of murder Tuesday and sentenced by a jury to decades in prison after he fatally stabbed Austin Metcalf, a white teenager, at a track meet when both boys were 17 years old.

Despite the prosecution claiming in opening statements that the case “has nothing to do with race”—and Metcalf’s father disavowing those who focused on race as a contributing factor—it quickly became a flashpoint in online political and racial discussions and criticism of the sentencing has poured in from well-known figures like rapper Cardi B and Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas.

Anthony’s legal team argued that he’d acted in self-defense after he was physically confronted by a larger member of the opposing track team during the meet, but prosecutors argued Anthony intentionally escalated an otherwise mild situation by stabbing Metcalf in the chest with a folding knife (he died shortly after).

Commenters debated if Anthony’s actions could reasonably be considered self defense; some claimed the response to the facts of the case would have been different if the races were reversed; others lamented that Anthony’s fate was decided by jury that included no Black people; and those on both sides of the debate expressed unease over a teenager being handed a 35-year sentence (Anthony was tried as an adult under Texas law).

Supporters of Metcalf and Anthony, respectively, rallied outside the Collin County Courthouse Tuesday and two people were reportedly arrested, including a Black man (arrested on a warrant) who was featured in a viral photo clashing with a white Metcalf supporter clad in an American flag polo.

how have people responded to the karmelo anthony conviction?

Andrew Anthony, Karmelo Anthony’s father, on Thursday called the situation “unfortunate” and one where “nobody wins.” He questioned if the outcome of the trial would have been the same if his son had not been tried by an “all-white jury” (reporting has suggested there were several minorities on the jury, but no Black people) and said he believes his son was “already convicted” in the court of public opinion before the trial began. Crockett, whose district includes parts of the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex but not Frisco, told TMZ she thinks the outcome of the trial would have been different if the races were reversed: “I don’t even know if (Anthony) would have been convicted, because if a white boy would have said that they were afraid of a Black boy, something tells me that that jury that didn’t have any Black people on it, they would have believed him and his fear,” she said. Dallas-based civil rights activist Dominique Alexander said the verdict showed “Black lives do not matter in Collin County.” The Collin County Young Democrats group supported Anthony and wrote in a Facebook post that “Justice must be more than punishment.” The Collin County NAACP posted on Facebook questioning “fairness, representation, and confidence in our justice system,” and questioned why there were no Black people on the jury. Anthony’s grandmother, Toni Hayes, was filmed shouting “Racist! Bias!” out of her car window as she left the courthouse Tuesday.

CRUCIAL QUOTE

“Wow! Just freakin wow! DISGUSTING… This is not justice, this is trying to make an example!!!” Cardi B posted about the sentencing.

Contra

Jeff Metcalf, the victim’s father, said he thinks Anthony should have been sentenced to life in prison. He said he had “a little bit of sorrow” for Anthony but vowed he will advocate against parole for the rest of his life and will record a video to play at parole hearings after he dies. Right-wing provocateur Jake Lang stood outside the courthouse and shouted that Anthony should be “lynched.” Sports columnist Jason Whitlock called the violence “senseless” and said Anthony “should’ve pleaded insanity” as the only “real explanation for his behavior.” State Rep. Jared Patterson, D-Frisco, said he hopes “this moment allows the Metcalf family and our community to begin the difficult process of healing and moving forward together.” A local city councilor, Burt Thakur, said, “justice was served.”

SURPRISING FACT

The families of Anthony and Metcalf have both received death threats, they said. Andrew Anthony said he’s been harassed by people who “want our family dead,” and Jeff Metcalf, the victim’s father, said he has received similar threats: “Yesterday, I had a death threat, this morning had multiple emails, texts threatening me, calling me all sorts of names,” he told CBS News.”

Why is the case being compared to Kyle Rittenhouse?

The case immediately evoked memories of the high-profile trial of Kyle Rittenhouse, a white man who shot three people—and killed two—in Wisconsin while illegally armed with an AR-15-style rifle during a Black Lives Matter protest. Rittenhouse was also 17 at the time, and claimed self defense in a case with strong racial and political overtones that also spurred large, controversial online fundraising campaigns. He was charged with multiple counts, including homicide, but was acquitted after a jury found he acted in self-defense. Supporters of Anthony have argued Rittenhouse was given the benefit of the doubt while Anthony was not for racial reasons, pointing out Rittenhouse was immediately supported by the conservative base while Anthony was widely condemned before trial. “White folks out here asking why Karmelo Anthony had a knife but had no problem with 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse having an AR 15 that he wasn’t licensed to carry,” Talbert Swan, a bishop and NAACP chapter president in Massachusetts, said. Critics say the two cases are fundamentally different, and that the legal facts are not as similar as the political narrative suggests. Rittenhouse slammed the comparison by saying, “I defended myself after I was violently attacked by white antifa thugs with criminal records—and it was clear I’d die if I didn’t defend myself. We are not the same.”

Key background

Anthony and Metcalf had never met before a Frisco school district track meet in April 2025. When it started raining, some athletes stayed on the field and others ran for cover under team tents, reports detail. Anthony’s school, Centennial High School, did not have a team tent and he instead sought shelter under the Memorial High tent, where Metcalf was a student. Witnesses told police Metcalf told Anthony to leave, to which Anthony responded, “Touch me and see what happens,” and then Metcalf grabbed Anthony to remove him from the tent. That’s when the witness said Anthony pulled out a knife, stabbed Metcalf once, then ran away. Anthony immediately told police he was the one who stabbed Melcalf, that he was “protecting himself” and asked if Metcalf was “going to be OK,” according to police reports. The case generated a massive amount of false information online—including fake autopsy reports and a fake social-media account impersonating the Frisco police chief—and an online legal-defense fundraiser raised hundreds of thousands of dollars in what critics argued was a “reward” for someone accused of murder.

TANGENT

The case deepened existing racial divides in Frisco, one of the fastest growing cities in the country that has for years struggled with changing demographics and anti-immigrant sentiment. The city, which has grown 61% in the last decade, is now majority minority with census data showing the population as 46% white, 34% Asian, 10% Latino and 10% Black. A candidate for Frisco mayor has called immigrants “rats” and Islam a “terrorist group,” the Washington Post reported, and locals have complained of an “Indian takeover” in the area. At one city council meeting, a man waved an Indian flag, spoke with a fake accent and said “I’ve started throwing my trash outside and pooping everywhere” to make Frisco feel more like home. Video of the meeting went viral. Anti-immigrant rhetoric has pushed several far-right politicians into seats of power: “Now that MAGA extremism is becoming the norm, people are more comfortable being racist in person and online,” Neha Suratran,a 22-year-old Hindu tech worker who was raised in Frisco, told the Post.