Nearly a week after the heartbreaking incident, Alex Pretti’s family officially spoke out about the 20-minute CCTV footage that is circulating: “My son was restrained in a completely different way,” and the 8 details they pointed out have changed the entire story… Specifically…
Just **5 minutes ago**, an official statement from **the family of nurse Alex Pretti** immediately attracted public attention nearly a week after the heartbreaking incident that shocked the entire United States. In their statement, the family clearly asserted that the **approximately 20-minute CCTV footage circulating on social media—which has been cited by media outlets—does not accurately reflect the actual events**, and that Alex was **controlled in a completely different way than what was initially presented.** They pointed out **eight specific details in this footage** which, they believe, if viewed objectively, could alter the entire narrative—from a victim of a chaotic attack to the image of an innocent American citizen subjected to excessive force by federal law enforcement.
Alex’s family began their statement by emphasizing that they **had reviewed the full 20-minute video footage, recorded by multiple individuals** from various angles, and not just the controversial “short clips” posted on social media in the early days. This video, they argue, shows the entire situation — from Alex’s arrival at the scene, to his encirclement, subduing, and eventual shooting — which contradicts what authorities and some official spokespersons had previously described. In the video, Alex **did not act aggressively, resist arrest, or attack any federal agents**; instead, he is seen attempting to de-escalate the situation and **protecting others who were being jostled, including a woman who fell to the ground**. This is a key detail the family insists must be carefully considered, as it contradicts the initial accusation that Alex “approached law enforcement with aggressive intent.”
The second detail the family points out is that in the opening moments of the CCTV footage, Alex **was not holding a weapon**, but only a phone — an action suggesting he was recording or documenting the situation to convey the truth rather than preparing to attack. Videos recorded by citizens and cited by the media clearly show this: in many frames, Alex is holding up his phone, standing next to or behind others, not directly threatening any federal agents. This contradicts the initial statement from the Department of Homeland Security that the victim had “approached agents with a gun.” ([TUOI TRE ONLINE][2])
Third, the family details the situation in which **Alex was pulled into a circle of restraint by multiple border force personnel simultaneously**, not attacked by a single individual. In the lengthy video, as Alex placed his hand on a woman’s shoulder to – according to his family – protect her from tear gas, several agents rushed in from different directions, restrained his arms, and pulled him to the ground. This action, which could have reduced a person’s ability to turn around, confront, or endanger the officers, was interpreted in the initial report in the opposite way.
Fourth, the family emphasized **the image of Alex being tear-gasped and under intense pressure from the officers before any shots were fired**. The footage the family reviewed shows Alex backing away from the agents, repeatedly exposed to tear gas, and not engaging in any aggressive behavior. This is a detail they believe was overlooked in previous reports, and if placed in full context, would change public understanding of Alex’s actions in that decisive moment.
Fifth, when Alex was legally disarmed — because he legally owned the gun and had a permit to carry it — the video shows **that weapon was taken away before the final shots were fired**. In several videos shared publicly, there is evidence showing a scene where federal agents took the gun from Alex’s hand while he was restrained on the ground, almost unable to reach anyone else. This is a detail the family claims is serious, as it could prove that when shot, Alex was no longer in control of the weapon — meaning he was no longer a direct threat, contrary to the initial description.
Sixth, the family points out that **Alex was previously seen trying to shield a woman who had been pushed and sprayed with pepper spray**, not intentionally moving toward a point of conflict. This action, when placed within an ethical and humanitarian context, is consistent with the image of a physician.
Alex was in the ICU—a person who always put the safety and protection of others above his own. The family believes this detail is key to understanding Alex’s “motives” in the moments before the incident.
Seventh, according to the family, the CCTV footage also shows the movements and expressions of those around him—including witnesses and those who were pushed—reflecting a chaotic, uncontrollable situation where **individual actions are easily misinterpreted or amplified by sirens, rockets, and the general tension of the protest**. They argue that this chaos should be considered when evaluating Alex’s behavior, rather than being isolated and interpreted in a single context.
Eighth, the point the family emphasizes most is **the contradiction between the versions from government agencies and the clear images in the video recorded by citizens**. In their statement, the family said they “watched the same video as the investigators” and believe that neither the initial statements from the Department of Homeland Security nor those from some senior officials accurately reflected the events. They considered much of the initial description to be “inaccurate or misinterpreted,” and that **has eroded public trust in the transparency of the investigation.”
The Alex Pretti family’s statement was not merely a personal reaction — it changed how public opinion and experts viewed the entire incident. In recent days, videos circulating on social media have become the center of debate, with many asserting that the footage shows Alex being shot while **unarmed and posing no apparent threat**, while authorities initially described the situation as him resisting law enforcement.
International media and legal analysts are also questioning the conduct and response of federal forces, especially as the incident occurred amidst **widespread protests against immigration policies and crackdowns in Minneapolis**. Many critics This is seen as a flashpoint where citizens’ rights, the right to peaceful protest, and the supremacy of law enforcement are clashing more intensely than ever before.
On a deeper level, Alex’s family’s presentation of these eight specific details is not only aimed at refuting initial claims, but also at promoting a more **independent and transparent** investigation. They are urging the public, the press, and the judicial authorities to review the entire video in a broader context, rather than relying solely on short clips or selected statements.
The coming days will determine whether Alex Pretti’s family’s reflections will change how the federal government handles the case. But clearly, the emergence of these details — and the family’s persistent voice — has transformed the incident from a mere act of violence into a symbol of a larger debate about human rights, law enforcement accountability, and the nature of truth. in a society of civic duty.
